Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
Summary of the case Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
H. Richard Austin appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) against the defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision.
Key Issues of the case Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
- Dismissal of complaint under Rule 60(d)(3)
- Review of reversible error
Key Facts of the case Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
- H. Richard Austin filed a complaint under Rule 60(d)(3)
- The district court dismissed the complaint
Decision of the case Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
Affirmed
Opinions
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: H. Richard Austin appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:13-cv-00877-BO, 2014 WL 1891419 (E.D.N.C.
May 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.