Browning v. State
Summary of the case Browning v. State
The District Court of Appeal of Florida reversed and remanded the trial court's judgment due to a scrivener's error. The judgment incorrectly cited a violation of section 794.011(8)(b) instead of the correct predecessor section 794.041(2)(b). The State conceded the error, and the court ordered an amended judgment to correct this citation.
Key Issues of the case Browning v. State
- Scrivener's error in judgment citation
- Incorrect statutory reference
Key Facts of the case Browning v. State
- Judgment cited section 794.011(8)(b) incorrectly
- Correct section is 794.041(2)(b)
Decision of the case Browning v. State
Reversed and remanded
Opinions
932 So.2d 1150 (2006) Rex BROWNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D05-4295. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 16, 2006.
LaROSE, Judge. We reverse and remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in Rex Browning's judgment. Mr. Browning's judgment incorrectly reflects a violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), when the judgment should have cited to the predecessor section 794.041(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991).
The State concedes error. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to prepare an amended judgment correcting this citation error. Reversed and remanded. DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.