The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
Ohio Supreme Court

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler

No. 95-2534·Judge: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright·Attorney: Bennett A. Manning and Sanford I. Casper, for relator.0 citations·Filed February 28, 1996

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Key Issues of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Key Facts of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Decision of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Per Curiam. Upon review of the record, we concur that respondent committed th...

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Key Issues of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Key Facts of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Decision of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Per Curiam. Upon review of the record, we concur that respondent committed th...

Summary of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler

The court reviewed the record and concurred with the board's finding of misconduct by the respondent. As a result, the respondent is suspended indefinitely from practicing law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to the respondent.

Key Issues of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler

  • Misconduct by the respondent
  • Indefinite suspension from practice of law

Key Facts of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler

  • The board found misconduct by the respondent
  • The court agreed with the board's recommendation

Decision of the case Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Schoettler

Respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio.

Opinions

Per Curiam. Upon review of the record, we concur that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and agree with its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap