The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Lian v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Lian v. Gonzales

06-60865·Judge: Davis, Barksdale, Benavides·Attorney: Charles Christophe, Christophe & Associates, New York, NY, for Petitioner., Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT July 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-60865 Clerk Summary Calendar

YAN LIAN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent. _________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (A77 322 415) _________________________________________________________________

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Yan Lian, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her

untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings. Lian contends her

motion to reopen: met the requirements set forth in 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); and, in the alternative, warranted equitable

tolling of the filing period. Lian has failed to show that the BIA

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 abused its discretion by denying her motion to reopen. See Lara v.

Trominski, 216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir. 2000).

DENIED

2

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap