The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >United States v. Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Lopez

96-311600 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31160 Summ...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-31160 Summ...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-31160 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARCOS GILBERTO LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CR-20022 ______________________________________ July 8, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arcos Gilberto Lopez, a federal prisoner (# 32794-019), appeal s from the district court’s

denial of his motion to reconsider the court’s denial of his “Emergency Motion for Specific

Performance of Plea Agreement,” which he filed almost 20 months after he pleaded guilty to

conspiracy to escape from a federal correctional facility. Lopez’s “Emergency Motion” was

“unauthorized” because the relief he sought was not available under any federal statute or rule

providing for postconviction relief. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994).

* Pursuant to 5TH Cir. R. 47.5 the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH Cir. R. 47.5. Relief was not available to Lopez under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35, 18 U.S.C. § 3742, 18 U.S.C. §

3582(c)(2), or 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See id.; § 2255. Although the district court denied Lopez’s motion

on the merits, it should have denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Early, 27 F.3d at 142.

However, this court may affirm on the alternative ground that Lopez’s “Emergency Motion” was

meritless, in that the Government did not breach the plea agreement with Lopez. See id.

AFFIRMED.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap