United States v. Valentin De La Cruz
No summary available for this case.
Opinions
Case: 12-16386 Date Filed: 07/22/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 12-16386 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00005-JSM-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VALENTIN DE LA CRUZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (July 22, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George Bedell, appointed counsel for Valentin de la Cruz in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, Case: 12-16386 Date Filed: 07/22/2013 Page: 2 of 2
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and de la Cruz’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2