American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, Gsa and Consolidated Case
Summary of the case American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, Gsa and Consolidated Case
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit considered motions related to further proceedings and remand in a case involving the American Federation of Government Employees and Steven Garfinkel. The court ordered a remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with a prior Supreme Court decision.
Key Issues of the case American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, Gsa and Consolidated Case
- Motion to govern further proceedings
- Motion to remand
Key Facts of the case American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, Gsa and Consolidated Case
- The case involves the American Federation of Government Employees and Steven Garfinkel.
- The court considered motions related to further proceedings and remand.
Decision of the case American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Steven Garfinkel, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, Gsa and Consolidated Case
Remanded to the district court
Opinions
889 F.2d 291
281 U.S.App.D.C. 276
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et
al., Appellants
v.
Steven GARFINKEL, Director, Information Security Oversight
Office, GSA, et al.
And consolidated case
No. 88-5402.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1989.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motions to govern further proceedings and the opposition to motion to remand, it is
ORDERED that these cases be remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with American Foreign Service Association v. Garfinkel, 109 S.Ct. 1693 (1989) (per curiam).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.