The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Ricky Emanuel Selby v. Willard C. Smith, Major David L. Van Nice, Captain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ricky Emanuel Selby v. Willard C. Smith, Major David L. Van Nice, Captain

93-61910 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 993 F.2d 1539 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpu...
  • AFFIRMED.
  • PER CURIAM:
  • OPINION
  • AFFIRMED
  • We also deny Selby's motion for a transcript

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 993 F.2d 1539 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpu...
  • AFFIRMED.
  • PER CURIAM:
  • OPINION
  • AFFIRMED
  • We also deny Selby's motion for a transcript

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

993 F.2d 1539

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ricky Emanuel SELBY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Willard C. SMITH, Major; David L. Van Nice, Captain,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6191.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 27, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-91-863)

Ricky Emanuel Selby, Appellant Pro Se.

Conrad Moss Shumadine, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ricky Emanuel Selby appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Selby v. Smith, No. CA-91-863 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1993). We deny Selby's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Selby's motion for a transcript

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap