Bryson v. Smith
Summary of the case Bryson v. Smith
William M. Bryson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision.
Key Issues of the case Bryson v. Smith
- Denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
- Review of district court's decision
Key Facts of the case Bryson v. Smith
- William M. Bryson, Jr. is a federal prisoner.
- The district court denied relief on Bryson's § 2241 petition.
Decision of the case Bryson v. Smith
Affirmed
Opinions
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6125
WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH V. SMITH, Warden of FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3594-6-20-AK)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bryson v. Smith, No. CA-02-3594-6-20-AK (D.S.C.
Dec. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2