Larosa v. Larosa | Court Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1223

JOSEPH LAROSA; DOMINICK LAROSA,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

JOAN LAROSA; VIRGIL B. LAROSA,

Defendants - Appellants,

and

WESBANCO; BANK ONE, WEST VIRGINIA, NA; RUSSELL L. BONASSO; HARRISON COUNTY BANK,

Parties in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John S. Kaull, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-9-1)

Submitted: August 23, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Crim, MCNEER, HIGHLAND, MCMUNN & VARNER, L.C., Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellants. Gregory H. Schillace, SCHILLACE LAW OFFICE, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Joan LaRosa and Virgil B. LaRosa appeal from the

magistrate judge’s order* determining that an “Order of Court”

entered in the District Court for the District of Maryland was a

final judgment in that action. The magistrate judge therefore

concluded that the Maryland judgment was properly registered in the

Northern District of West Virginia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963

(2000), and accordingly denied Joan and Virgil’s motion to quash

the registration of judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs

and the record on appeal and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate

judge. See LaRosa v. LaRosa, No. CA-02-9-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 23,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 3 -

Opinions