Lindsey v. Benjamin | Court Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6047

ROY GAREY LINDSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN BENJAMIN; WILLIAM E. GUNN; TYRONE MURRAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4210)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Garey Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Roy Garey Lindsey appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action, and denying in part and granting in part Lindsey’s

motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Lindsey v. Benjamin, No. CA-01-

4210 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2002; Dec. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Opinions