The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Zyrone Cooper v. Bruce Bofus, and Linda Wolf, the Supervising Manager Reshid Baig Arthur Lund Pat Morrison James Shore Denny Croger Dawn Cola Tom Hatch Jason Kausshan Karla Jones Tom Kwiatkuwrkis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Zyrone Cooper v. Bruce Bofus, and Linda Wolf, the Supervising Manager Reshid Baig Arthur Lund Pat Morrison James Shore Denny Croger Dawn Cola Tom Hatch Jason Kausshan Karla Jones Tom Kwiatkuwrkis

97-356780 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 131 F.3d 146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other...
  • MEMORANDUM
  • VAN SICKLE.
  • AFFIRMED.
  • Cooper's pending motions are denied

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 131 F.3d 146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other...
  • MEMORANDUM
  • VAN SICKLE.
  • AFFIRMED.
  • Cooper's pending motions are denied

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

131 F.3d 146

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Zyrone COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce BOFUS, Defendant,
and
Linda Wolf, the supervising manager; Reshid Baig; Arthur
Lund; Pat Morrison; James Shore; Denny Croger; Dawn
Cola; Tom Hatch; Jason Kausshan; Karla Jones; Tom
Kwiatkuwrkis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-35678

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1997**
Decided Nov. 21, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

Before HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

VAN SICKLE.

3

Zyrone Cooper appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of federal jurisdiction of his action alleging he was subjected to a pattern of harassment based on racial, religious and handicap discrimination in a federally subsidized housing complex. Cooper's appeal is frivolous, and the district court did not err in dismissing his action.1

4

AFFIRMED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

1

Cooper's pending motions are denied

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap