United States v. Coleman | Court Opinion

Opinions

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6485

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOYCE COLEMAN,

Defendant — Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-75)

Submitted: September 24, 2004 Decided: October 8, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Boyce Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Boyce Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying

in part his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Coleman, No. CR-95-75 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -