The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >People v. Marques
Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Marques

24828·Judge: Per Curiam·Attorney: Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, John P. Moore, Deputy, Richard G. McManus, Jr., Assistant, for plaintiffappellee., Róllie R. Rogers, State Public Defender, J. D. MacFarlane, Chief Deputy, Thomas M. Van Cleave III, Deputy, for defendant-appellant.5 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 498 P.2d 929 (1972) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,...
  • The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Ray MARQUES, Defendant-Appellant.
  • Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
  • PER CURIAM.

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • 498 P.2d 929 (1972) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,...
  • The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Ray MARQUES, Defendant-Appellant.
  • Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
  • PER CURIAM.

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

498 P.2d 929 (1972)

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Ray MARQUES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 24828.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 26, 1972.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., John P. Moore, Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard G. Mc-Manus, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Rollie R. Rogers, Colo. State Public Defender, J. D. MacFarlane, Chief Deputy, State Public Defender, Thomas M. Van Cleave III, Deputy State Public Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant, William Ray Marques, was convicted of the crime of carrying a concealed weapon, after having been previously convicted of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon during the preceding ten years. 1965 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 40-11-10(1). On appeal, he challenges the constitutionality of the statute.

One of the arguments raised in this appeal was considered by us and resolved adversely to the defendant-appellant in People v. Trujillo, Colo., 497 P.2d 1 [announced April 17, 1972], wherein we determined that the statute in question is not subject to constitutional attack under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. U.S.Const. amend. XIV (Fourteenth Amendment). The defendant-appellant's other claim is that the statute deprives him of his Second Amendment right to bear arms. U.S.Const. amend. II (Second Amendment). This claim is also without merit. United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 59 S.Ct. 816, 83 L.Ed. 1206 (1939); United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588 (1875); State v. Bolin, 200 Kan. 369, 436 P.2d 978 (1968); Harris v. State, 83 Nev. 404, 432 P.2d 929 (1967).

Therefore, we affirm the judgment.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap