Aldoff v. Beal
Summary of the case Aldoff v. Beal
Plaintiff Larry Aldoff appealed an adverse judgment from the district court following a bench trial. The Court of Appeals issued a notice of proposed summary disposition to affirm the judgment. Plaintiff requested an extension to file a memorandum opposing the summary affirmance, which was granted until December 4, 2015. No memorandum in opposition was filed by the deadline, leading the court to affirm the district court's judgment.
Key Issues of the case Aldoff v. Beal
- Appeal of adverse judgment
- Failure to file opposition memorandum
Key Facts of the case Aldoff v. Beal
- Plaintiff appealed a district court judgment
- No opposition memorandum was filed by the deadline
Decision of the case Aldoff v. Beal
Affirmed
Opinions
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 IN THE MATTER OF CRISTI ALDOFF 3 LARRY ALDOFF,
4 Plaintiff-Appellant,
5 vs. No. 34,391
6 DENNY BEAL, KAYLA BEAL, JIMMY 7 BEAL, and JOHN BEAL,
8 Defendants-Appellees.
9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 10 Nan G Nash, District Judge
11 Larry Aldoff 12 Los Lunas, NM
13 Pro Se Appellant
14 Cadigan Law Firm, P.C. 15 Michael J. Cadigan 16 Kristina Caffrey
17 for Appellees
18 MEMORANDUM OPINION
19 HANISEE, Judge. 1 {1} Plaintiff appeals an adverse judgment entered by the district court following a
2 bench trial. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to affirm.
3 Plaintiff requested an extension of time in which to file a memorandum opposing such
4 summary affirmance, and the extension was granted until December 4, 2015. To date,
5 over a month later, no memorandum in opposition has been filed. Therefore, for the
6 reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.
7 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
13 14 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
2