State v. Crabb

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,472

5 TAYLOR CRABB,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY 8 Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge

9 Hector Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Plaintiff-Appellee

12 Taylor Crabb 13 Hobbs, NM

14 Pro Se Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 _______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 ___________________________________ 9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

10 _________________________________ 11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

2