The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >John Anthony Maricevich v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida

John Anthony Maricevich v. State of Florida

Ño. 1D14-5362·Judge: Wolf, Bilbrey, Winokur·Attorney: John Anthony Markevich, pro se, Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN ANTHONY...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN ANTHONY...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JOHN ANTHONY NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO MARICEVICH, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D14-5362 v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 16, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

John Anthony Maricevich, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

WOLF, J.

Appellant challenges the denial of his amended motion filed pursuant to

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the court denied following an

evidentiary hearing. He raises several issues, including that the trial court abused its

discretion in denying his motion to appoint counsel. We agree. The record reflects that appellant is illiterate and has only a third-grade education. He raised complex

issues pursuant to Alcorn v. State, 121 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 2013), alleging he failed to

enter a plea because he was affirmatively misadvised as to the collateral

consequences of that plea. Based on the record before us and the complexity of the

issues involved, we find the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant

appellant’s motion to appoint counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So. 2d 738, 740

(Fla. 1985) (finding a trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for counsel

for a postconviction hearing where the petitioner was semi-literate, had only a

second-grade education, and raised a colorable claim that required an evidentiary

hearing).

We reverse the order denying the amended postconviction motion and remand

to the trial court for a new hearing after counsel has been appointed.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BILBREY and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

2

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap