Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Ryan Horn

15-2330·Judge: Arnold, Per Curiam, Smith, Wollman·Attorney: Erin R. Eldridge, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Ryan Douglas Horn, Leavenworth, KS, pro se., Brian Dean Johnson, Jacobsen & Johnson, Cedar Rapids, IA, for DefendanL-Ap-pellant.0 citations

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 15-2330 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ryan Douglas Horn

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________

Submitted: February 10, 2016 Filed: February 16, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Ryan Horn directly appeals after he pled guilty to a drug offense and a firearm offense and the district court1 imposed a within-Guidelines-range sentence. His

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Horn’s sentence is substantively unreasonable.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1076-77 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________

-2-