The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >People v. Keys
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

People v. Keys

235 1798/13·Judge: Friedman, Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Sweeny0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • People v Keys (2016 NY Slip Op 01123) People v Keys 2016 NY Slip Op 01123 Dec...
  • his counsel.
  • THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
  • CLERK

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • People v Keys (2016 NY Slip Op 01123) People v Keys 2016 NY Slip Op 01123 Dec...
  • his counsel.
  • THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
  • CLERK

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

People v Keys (2016 NY Slip Op 01123)
People v Keys
2016 NY Slip Op 01123
Decided on February 16, 2016
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 16, 2016
Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

235 1798/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

James Keys, Defendant-Appellant.




Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Ryan of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sabrina Margret Bierer of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered April 22, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's constitutional speedy trial motion. Even considering the period following the court's decision on the motion, about which defendant has not preserved any claim, we find, upon consideration of the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), that there was no violation of defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial. In particular, most of the delay is attributable to defendant and

his counsel.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 16, 2016

CLERK



The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap