The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Dr. Girish Sahu v. Minneapolis Community and
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Dr. Girish Sahu v. Minneapolis Community and

16-1741·Judge: Gruender, Benton, Shepherd·Attorney: Girish Chandra Sahu, Pro Se, Tamar Gronvall, Kathryn Morrell Woodruff, Assistant Attorney, Attorney General’s Office, Consumer Enforcement Division, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _______________________...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _______________________...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 16-1741 ___________________________

Dr. Girish Sahu, MD

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Minneapolis Community and Technical College; Dr. Hafed Bouassida, PhD; Dr. Jess Lee Niebuhr, PhD; Dianna Cusick

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________

Submitted: February 2, 2017 Filed: February 7, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Dr. Girish Sahu appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VI, and state law. He also has moved for sanctions in this court. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

A de novo review of the record reveals dismissal was proper. See Adams v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss). As to Sahu’s motion for sanctions, there is no indication that defendants acted in bad faith.

The judgment is affirmed and Sahu’s motion is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap