Abrams v. Almsberger
Summary of the case Abrams v. Almsberger
Plaintiff Trudy Abrams appealed the district court's judgment in favor of Defendant Scott Almsberger, which included an award of attorney fees. The Court of Appeals issued a notice of proposed summary disposition to affirm the district court's decision. Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition and indicated no intention to do so. Consequently, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment.
Key Issues of the case Abrams v. Almsberger
- Appeal of district court's judgment
- Award of attorney fees
Key Facts of the case Abrams v. Almsberger
- Plaintiff appealed the district court's judgment
- Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition
Decision of the case Abrams v. Almsberger
Affirmed
Opinions
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 TRUDY ABRAMS,
3 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant ,
4 v. NO. 35,702
5 SCOTT ALMSBERGER,
6 Defendant/Counterplaintiff-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY 8 Sarah C. Backus, District Judge
9 Emery Law Firm 10 Kelan Emery 11 Taos, NM
12 L. Helen Bennett P.C. 13 L. Helen Bennett 14 Albuquerque, NM
15 for Appellant
16 Alan Maestas Law Office, P.C. 17 Alan H. Maestas 18 Pamela S. Sullivan 19 Taos, NM
20 for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION
2 GARCIA, Judge.
3 {1} Plaintiff appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendant and award
4 of attorney fees. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to
5 affirm. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, but instead has filed a
6 notice indicating she does not plan to filed such a memorandum. Therefore, for the
7 reasons stated in out notice, we affirm.
8 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 ________________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
11 WE CONCUR:
12 _______________________________ 13 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
14 _______________________________ 15 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2