The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Dorothy Snyder v. John Snyder
Washington Supreme Court

Dorothy Snyder v. John Snyder

No. 13774·Judge: Chadwick·Attorney: Howard O. Hurle, for appellant.0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Chadwick, J. — ^Action for divorce on the grounds of nonsupport and neglect....
  • Chadwick, J. —

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Chadwick, J. — ^Action for divorce on the grounds of nonsupport and neglect....
  • Chadwick, J. —

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

Chadwick, J. —

^Action for divorce on the grounds of nonsupport and neglect. The parties were married at North Yakima in August, 1914. Respondent worked at “odd jobs” for three weeks .in North Yakima, and then borrowed money with which to take himself and wife to the home of his parents in Seattle. One child was born as the fruit of their union.

The record shows that, during the time intervening between November, 1914, and May, 1915, respondent had but two months of steady employment, and that during that time he contributed nothing to the support of his wife. In May, *6201915, he went to Portland, Oregon, promising to send her money. From Portland he went to San Francisco, and thence to Fort Rosecrans, where he joined the United States Army for a period of enlistment expiring in 1918. He was transferred from Fort Rosecrans to Fort Worden, Washington, in March, 1916. During his absence, the extent of his contributions to the maintenance of his wife and baby seems to have consisted of two money orders of fifty cents each. Appellant, since her marriage, has had to rely on the charity and kindness of relatives for that support which her husband has denied her.

It is unnecessary to further detail “the short and simple annals” of this unhappy pair. We find the charge of nonsupport to be unquestionably sustained.

“Divorces may be granted by the superior court on application of the party injured, for the following causes:

“(6) ... or the neglect or refusal of the husband to make suitable provisions for his family.” Rem. Code, § 982.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant the prayer of appellant’s complaint.

Ellis, C. J., Main, and Webster, JJ., concur.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap