Washington Supreme Court
Northern Pacific Railway Company v. P. J. Concannon
No. 9771·Attorney: Geo. T. Reid, J. W. Quick, and L. B. da Ponte, for appellant., Gordon, Easterday & Askren and Suffer, Hayden & Hamilton, for respondents.0 citations
No summary available for this case.
Opinions
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
— Upon the facts as stated in the opinion filed in this court on October 7, 1913, 75 Wash. 591, 135 Pac. 652, and after reargument upon the record, we affirm the finding of the trial judge that respondent Concannon had acquired title to that part of the right of way of appellant now occupied by him, by adverse possession prior to the 28th day of April, 1904.
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Note: Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382.