Dismissal of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

Alan Andrew Mackety, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision.

Review of district court's decision

Alan Andrew Mackety, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision.

Alan Mackety v. Stephanie Hollembaek | Court Opinion

Opinions

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6488

ALAN ANDREW MACKETY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02120-D)

Submitted: August 4, 2017 Decided: August 15, 2017

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan Andrew Mackety, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alan Andrew Mackety, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mackety v. Hollembaek, No. 5:16-

hc-02120-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED