The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Nicolaou, h/w, Pets v. Martin, J., M.D.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Nicolaou, h/w, Pets v. Martin, J., M.D.

Nicolaou, h/w, Pets v. Martin, J., M.D. - No. 58 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Judge: Per Curiam0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA M.D. Appeal Dkt. 44 MAP 2017 MIDDLE DIST...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA M.D. Appeal Dkt. 44 MAP 2017 MIDDLE DIST...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA M.D. Appeal Dkt. 44 MAP 2017 MIDDLE DISTRICT

NANCY NICOLAOU AND NICHOLAS : No. 58 MAL 2017 NICOLAOU, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : JAMES J. MARTIN, M.D., LOUISE A. : DILLONSYNDER, CRNP, JEFFREY D. : GOULD, M.D., ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL, : ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH : NETWORK, ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL : UNION STATION MEDICAL SURGICAL : CLINIC D/B/A ST. LUKE'S SOUTHSIDE : MEDICAL CENTER, ST. LUKE'S : ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL GROUP, : AND NAZARETH FAMILY PRACTICE, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

a. Did the Trial Court err in granting Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment and holding that Petitioners’ medical malpractice action was time barred under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2) and did not meet the Discovery Rule Exception when Plaintiff did not, and was financially unable to, confirm Respondents’ negligent misdiagnosis until final medical testing confirmed she had Lyme Disease on February 13, 2010? b. Did the Trial Court abuse its discretion in granting Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment when there was a genuine issue of material fact, which should be presented to a jury, as to whether Petitioners’ medical malpractice action is tolled from the running of the Statute of Limitations under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2) by the Discovery Rule?

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

[58 MAL 2017] - 2

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap