Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Qualon Williams

16-11617 Conference Calendar·Judge: Jolly, Higginbotham, Elrod·Attorney: James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee, Qualon Rashard Williams, Pro Se0 citations

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

Case: 16-11617 Document: 00514121663 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11617 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED August 18, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

QUALON RASHARD WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-362-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Qualon Rashard Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Williams has not filed a response. Although Williams remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-11617 Document: 00514121663 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017

No. 16-11617

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

2