The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass

0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Key Issues of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Key Facts of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Decision of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Order entered June 10, 1948, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiff an e...

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Key Issues of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Key Facts of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Decision of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Order entered June 10, 1948, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiff an e...

Summary of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass

The court affirmed the order entered on June 10, 1948, which granted the plaintiff an examination of defendants on certain items while denying others. The decision included $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents.

Key Issues of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass

  • Examination of defendants
  • Costs and disbursements

Key Facts of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass

  • Order entered June 10, 1948
  • Examination granted on some items and denied on others

Decision of the case Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Louis I. Pokrass

Affirmed

Opinions

Order entered June 10, 1948, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiff an examination of defendants on some items and denying others, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag,

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap