The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >The People of the State of New York v. Carlos Cabrera
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

The People of the State of New York v. Carlos Cabrera

2 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J., at hearing; Dor...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J., at hearing; Dor...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J., at hearing; Dora L. Irizarry, J., at plea and sentence), rendered April 12, 2002, convicting defendant of criminal sale of *239a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of SVs to 25 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of 6 to 18 years, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Defendant did not preserve his present claim that he was seized on the basis of an inadequate description, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant because he fit the description of a person who had sold drugs to an undercover officer moments before. This description, which included his distinctive clothing and hair color and the clothing of the man accompanying him, was sufficiently specific given the spatial and temporal factors and the absence of any other pair of men who could meet these descriptions (see e.g. People v Ortiz, 291 AD2d 273 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 679 [2002]). In any event, based on this description, the police at least had reasonable suspicion, which ripened into probable cause when defendant discarded bags of cocaine as he was being lawfully detained.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap