The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >In the Matter of Lamont Dale M. St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent Cleo C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

In the Matter of Lamont Dale M. St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent Cleo C.

2 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the moth...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the moth...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), entered October 8, 2003, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, upon finding that she abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursement.

The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing proof that the mother abandoned the subject child during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The mother did not visit or contact the child, or establish that she was unable to do so, and the petitioner did not prevent or discourage contact between, the mother and the child during that period (see Social Services Law § 384-b [5]; Matter of Julius P., 63 NY2d 477, 481 [1984]; Matter of Lee P., 304 AD2d 760 [2003]). Furthermore, the Family Court properly concluded that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate the mother’s parental rights (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 148 [1984]; Matter of Brandon W., 262 AD2d 644 [1999]; Matter of Maldrina R., 219 AD2d 723, 724 [1995]).

The mother’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap