The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent

0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Key Issues of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Key Facts of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Decision of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Order entered on November 9, 1961 so far as appealed from unanimously affirme...

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Key Issues of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Key Facts of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Decision of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Order entered on November 9, 1961 so far as appealed from unanimously affirme...

Summary of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent

The court unanimously affirmed the order entered on November 9, 1961, with $20 costs and disbursements awarded to the plaintiff-respondent-appellant. The decision was concurred by Justices Breitel, Valente, McNally, Eager, and Steuer.

Key Issues of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent

  • Not available
  • Not available

Key Facts of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent

  • Order entered on November 9, 1961
  • Costs and disbursements awarded to plaintiff-respondent-appellant

Decision of the case Betsy Stark v. Albert D. Stark, Appellant-Respondent

Affirmed

Opinions

Order entered on November 9, 1961 so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-respondent-appellant. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap