The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >The People of the State of New York v. Mark Burgess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

The People of the State of New York v. Mark Burgess

7 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • *970 Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau Cou...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • *970 Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau Cou...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

*970Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kase, J.), rendered January 22, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-17 [1983]). The defendant’s assertion that his plea was pressured or coerced is belied by the record (see People v Scott, 77 AD3d 689, 689 [2010]; People v Aguayo, 73 AD3d 938, 939 [2010]; People v Mirecki, 63 AD3d 1089 [2009]).

We find the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was not valid. However, “ ‘[b]y pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited . . . his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel which do not directly involve the bargaining process’ ” (People v Perazzo, 65 AD3d 1058, 1059 [2009], quoting People v Russell, 58 AD3d 759, 760 [2009]; see People v DeLuca, 45 AD3d 777 [2007]; People v Turner, 40 AD3d 1018, 1019 [2007]). Moreover, “[t]o the extent that the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel involves matter dehors the record, it cannot be reviewed on direct appeal” (People v Bermejo, 77 AD3d 965, 966 [2010]; see People v Kent, 79 AD3d 52, 72 [2010]; People v Tillman, 74 AD3d 1251 [2010]; People v Surin, 70 AD3d 731, 732 [2010]). Insofar as the defendant’s claim may properly be reviewed, the record reveals that defense counsel provided effective assistance (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712. [1998]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap