In the Matter of United Environmental Techniques, Inc. v. State of New York Department of Health
No summary available for this case.
Opinions
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on or about May 18, 1994, which granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s revocation of petitioner’s provisional approval as an asbestos safety training sponsor to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for an administrative hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent’s rule requiring cause for its revoking or suspending provisional as well as final approvals of asbestos training safety programs (10 NYCRR 73.9), and its failure to revoke, suspend or otherwise take any action with respect to petitioner’s provisional approval within the six-month maximum life span of such an approval (10 NYCRR 73.8 [a]), supported a legitimate claim of entitlement to continuation of the approval (see, Barry v Barchi, 443 US 55, 64, n 11; Richardson v Town of Eastover, 922 F2d 1152, 1158), which may be invoked at a postsuspension hearing (see, Barry v Barchi, supra, at 66). Under the three-pronged test set forth in Mathews v Eldridge (424 US 319, 335), petitioner’s interest in