The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Jeffrey Miller v. Nancy Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Jeffrey Miller v. Nancy Berryhill

17-2043·Judge: Gruender, Bowman, Kelly·Attorney: John Thomas Murray, Columbia, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant, Jeffrey P. Ray, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Anne M. Zeigler, Assistant Regional Counsel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellee0 citations

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _______________________...

Table of Contents

  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _______________________...

No summary available for this case.

Opinions

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2043 ___________________________

Jeffrey Paul Miller

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________

Submitted: February 7, 2018 Filed: February 12, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Paul Miller appeals the order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security

1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. income. For reversal, Miller contends that the ALJ (1) did not give sufficient weight to the cognitive problems caused by his diabetes and joint pain; (2) erred in not according controlling weight to his treating physician’s assessment; (3) did not accord sufficient weight to the effects of his musculoskeletal impairments; and (4) erred in determining he could perform unskilled light work. Following careful review of the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s determinations are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and that Miller’s arguments do not support reversal. See Andrews v. Colvin, 791 F.3d 923, 928 (8th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap