Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
Summary of the case Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Bernalillo County in favor of the defendants, Francisco Javier Rodriguez and others, in a case involving The Bank of New York Mellon. The court issued a summary affirmance as no memorandum opposing the proposed summary disposition was filed.
Key Issues of the case Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
- Summary affirmance
- Lack of opposition to proposed disposition
Key Facts of the case Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
- The Bank of New York Mellon is the plaintiff-appellant.
- No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed.
Decision of the case Bank of New York Mellon v. Rodriguez
Affirmed
Opinions
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 3 F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as 4 Successor in Interest to JPMORGAN 5 CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 6 As Trustee for RBSGC MORTGAGE LOAN 7 TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 8 CERTIFICATE, SERIES 2005-RPI, 9 10 Plaintiff-Appellant,
11 v. NO. A-1-CA-36317
12 FRANCISCO JAVIER RODRIGUEZ AND 13 JANE DOE RODRIGUEZ, husband and 14 wife; PATRICIA ESTRADA, if living; if 15 deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF 16 PATRICIA ESTRADA, DECEASED; 17 CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE; ABC Corporations 18 I-X, XYZ Partnerships I-X, John Does I-X 19 and Jane Does I-X, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS 20 AND DEVISEES OF ANY OF THE ABOVE, 21 IF DECEASED; OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY,
22 Defendants-Appellees.
23 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 24 Victor S. Lopez, District Judge
25 McCarthy & Holthus, LLP 26 Karen Weaver 1 Joshua T. Chappell 2 Albuquerque, NM
3 for Appellant
4 Daniel P. Dietz, Assistant City Attorney 5 Albuquerque, NM
6 for Appellee City of Albuquerque
7 MEMORANDUM OPINION
8 VANZI, Chief Judge.
9 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
10 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
11 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
12 {2} AFFIRMED.
13 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
14 __________________________________ 15 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
16 WE CONCUR:
17 _________________________________ 18 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
19 _________________________________
2 1 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge
3