The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust

13-20-00350-CV0 citations·Filed August 20, 2020

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Key Issues of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Key Facts of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Decision of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • NUMBER 13-20-00350-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CH...

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Key Issues of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Key Facts of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Decision of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • NUMBER 13-20-00350-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CH...

Summary of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust

The Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas reviewed an emergency motion related to the Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust. The court granted in part and denied in part the appellants' motion for an emergency stay and remand. The court maintained the status quo pending appeal, emphasizing the connection between the emergency motion and the appeal's merits.

Key Issues of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust

  • Emergency stay request
  • Status quo maintenance pending appeal

Key Facts of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust

  • Appellants filed an emergency motion
  • Court maintained the status quo pending appeal

Decision of the case in the Matter of Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust

The emergency stay previously granted, in part, by this Court shall remain in effect.

Opinions

NUMBER 13-20-00350-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE MATTER OF BUMSTEAD FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST On appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas. ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam On August 10, 2020, this Court issued an order (1) granting in part and denying in part “Appellants’ Motion for Emergency Stay and To Remand the Trial Court’s Order for Further Proceedings,”1 and (2) directing appellees2 to file a response to that motion.3 1 Appellants include Taylor C. Moss, individually, as trustee of the TCM Trust; the Bumstead Living Trust; the Bumstead Family Trust; the Bumstead Survivor’s Trust; and the Sylvia M. Bumstead Revocable Trust, and as Manager of Wolf Trot Properties, LLC and Wolf Trot Properties d/b/a Melia Investments, LLC, DeisoMoss, LLC and DeisoMoss Property Management, LLC. 2 Appellees include Debra M. Holzworth, Kathryn S.

Marcotte, and Carol Bumstead Moss, Individually, as Trustees of their respective Exempt Trusts, as Trustees of their respective Descendant’s Trusts, as CoTrustees of the Bumstead Family Irrevocable Trust, and as Named Co-Trustees of the Bumstead Family Trust. 3 This cause was transferred to this Court from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals pursuant to order The Court has now received appellees’ response to appellants’ emergency motion and has further received a reply thereto from appellants. The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion, the response, and the reply, is of the opinion that the emergency stay previously granted, in part, by this Court shall remain in effect as stated in our August 10, 2020 order. The parties’ briefing on appellants’ emergency motion clearly indicates that the merits of the emergency motion are inextricably linked to the merits of the appeal itself, and based on the facts and circumstances presented, this Court’s order maintains the status quo pending appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3 (providing that the appellate court may make any temporary orders necessary to preserve the parties' rights until disposition of the appeal); In re Geomet Recycling LLC, 578 S.W.3d 82, 89 (Tex. 2019) (orig. proceeding) (“Rule 29.3 gives an appellate court great flexibility in preserving the status quo based on the unique facts and circumstances presented.”).

The Court will entertain any motions deemed necessary to advance this appeal on its docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 20th day of August, 2020. issued by the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap