Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
Summary of the case Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered that the case involving Claudia Elena Montejo-Gonzalez and others against Pamela Bondi be reheard en banc. The previous three-judge panel opinion has been vacated.
Key Issues of the case Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
- Rehearing en banc
- Vacating of three-judge panel opinion
Key Facts of the case Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
- Case involves Claudia Elena Montejo-Gonzalez and others
- Pamela Bondi is the respondent
Decision of the case Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
Not available
Opinions
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJONo. 21-304 GONZALEZ; DANY JUAN FRANCISCO Agency Nos. MONTEJO; MARIA NATALIA A201-670-355 FRANCISCO MONTEJO, A201-670-354 A201-670-353 Petitioners, v. ORDER PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. MURGUIA, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.