The Law Lion Logo - AI-powered legal writing assistantThe Law Lion
Home
Features
Pricing
Services
AboutBlogCasesContact
Login
Ask Law Lion AI
  1. Home
  2. >Cases
  3. >Sattler v. Passaro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Sattler v. Passaro

Index No. 606866/180 citations·Filed December 21, 2022

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Key Issues of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Key Facts of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Decision of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Sattler v Passaro (2022 NY Slip Op 07254) Sattler v Passaro 2022 NY Slip Op 0...

Table of Contents

  • Summary of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Key Issues of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Key Facts of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Decision of the case Sattler v. Passaro
  • Opinions
  • Opinions
  • Sattler v Passaro (2022 NY Slip Op 07254) Sattler v Passaro 2022 NY Slip Op 0...

Summary of the case Sattler v. Passaro

In Sattler v. Passaro, the plaintiff, Robert Sattler, appealed an order granting summary judgment to the defendant, Marco Passaro, in a personal injury case. Sattler alleged that Passaro's dog bit him, causing bruising and emotional trauma. The court affirmed the dismissal, finding no evidence that the dog had vicious propensities or that Passaro knew or should have known of such propensities. The plaintiff's evidence was deemed inadmissible hearsay, insufficient to raise a triable issue.

Key Issues of the case Sattler v. Passaro

  • Strict liability for dog bites
  • Owner's knowledge of dog's vicious propensities

Key Facts of the case Sattler v. Passaro

  • Plaintiff alleged a dog bite incident causing bruising and emotional trauma.
  • Defendant's dog was not leashed or chained during the incident.

Decision of the case Sattler v. Passaro

Affirmed summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Opinions

Sattler v Passaro (2022 NY Slip Op 07254) Sattler v Passaro 2022 NY Slip Op 07254 Decided on December 21, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Decided on December 21, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE LINDA CHRISTOPHER JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ. 2020-04727 (Index No. 606866/18) []Robert Sattler, appellant, vMarco Passaro, respondent. Milenkovic Law Group PLLC, White Plains, NY (Srdjan Milenkovic of counsel), for appellant.

Abamont & Associates, Garden City, NY (Thomas G. Carton of counsel), for respondent. DECISION & ORDER In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. Mahon, J.), entered May 18, 2020. The order granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action in May 2018 to recover damages for personal injuries he alleged arose from an incident in July 2017 wherein the defendant's dog bit him. The plaintiff asserted causes of action alleging, inter alia, negligence and strict liability. The plaintiff alleged that, on the day at issue, he was walking on a sidewalk in Long Beach when the defendant's dog, a German shepard, which was not chained or leashed, ran at him while growling and bit him on the hip. The plaintiff alleged that, although the bite did not break his skin, he sustained bruising and emotional trauma.

The defendant thereafter moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint submitting, among other things, the transcript of his deposition testimony in support of the motion. The plaintiff opposed. In an order entered May 18, 2020, the Supreme Court granted the motion. The plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. To recover in strict liability for damages caused by a dog, a plaintiff must establish that the dog had vicious propensities and that the owner knew or should have known of the dog's vicious propensities (see Petrone v Fernandez, 12 NY3d 546, 550; M.B. v Hanson, 168 AD3d 706, 708). Vicious propensities include the propensity to do any act that might endanger the safety of the persons and property of others (see Collier v Zambito, 1 NY3d 444, 446; Drakes v Bakshi, 175 AD3d 465, 465). “Evidence tending to prove that a dog has vicious propensities includes a prior attack, the dog's tendency to growl, snap, or bare its teeth, the manner in which the dog was restrained, and a proclivity to act in a way that puts others at risk of harm” (Hodgson-Romain v Hunter, 72 AD3d 741, 741; see Drakes v Bakshi, 175 AD3d at 466). Here, the defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating, through his deposition testimony, that he was not aware, nor should have []been aware, that the dog had previously bitten anyone or had vicious propensities (see Costanza v Scarlata, 188 AD3d 1145, 1146; Cintorrino v Rowsell, 163 AD3d 919, 920).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The only evidence offered by the plaintiff to demonstrate that, prior to this incident, the dog exhibited fierce or violent tendencies was inadmissible hearsay, which is insufficient, on its own, to bar summary judgment (see Ciliotta v Ranieri, 149 AD3d 1032, 1033; Roche v Bryant, 81 AD3d 707, 708). Further, the nature and severity of the attack does not demonstrate that the defendant knew or should have known of the dog's alleged vicious propensities (see Hai v Psoras, 166 AD3d 732, 734). The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit (see Roche v Bryant, 81 AD3d at 708).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, CHRISTOPHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. ENTER: Maria T. Fasulo Clerk of the Court

The Law Lion logoThe Law Lion.

The Law Lion is the only platform combining AI legal writing grounded in real case law with an expert human writing service — serving attorneys, paralegals, and everyday people nationwide.

info@thelawlion.com
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm EST · Rush available
Serving Clients Nationwide

AI Tool

  • → AI Legal Writing Tool
  • → AI Document Drafting
  • → Motion Drafting
  • → Contract Drafting
  • → Legal Research
  • → Case Law Search
  • → Citation Generator
  • → Document Review
  • → Contract Review
  • → For Lawyers

Writing Service

  • → Eviction Defense
  • → Court Documents
  • → Custody & Family
  • → Divorce Documents
  • → Debt & Collections
  • → All Writing Services

Top Guides

  • → Eviction Response Guide
  • → Best AI Legal Tools 2026
  • → Debt Validation Letter Guide

Company

  • → About The Law Lion
  • → Client Results
  • → Transparent Pricing
  • → Legal Guides & Blog
  • → Contact & Free Consult
  • → Affiliate Program

Top Services

  • → Eviction Notice Response
  • → Debt Validation Letter
  • → Court Summons Response
© 2026 The Law Lion LLC · AI Legal Writing & Expert Document Service
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap