State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
Summary of the case State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
The court granted JoAnn Reeds' motion for leave to intervene and dismissed the relators' remaining claims without prejudice due to failure to file a complaint or petition and non-compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B).
Key Issues of the case State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
- Motion for leave to intervene
- Dismissal for procedural non-compliance
Key Facts of the case State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
- JoAnn Reeds filed a motion for leave to intervene
- Relators failed to file a complaint or petition
Decision of the case State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
Motion to intervene granted; claims dismissed without prejudice
Opinions
On Return to Regular Docket, S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relators’ motion to strike, and motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relators’ remaining claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to filé a complaint or petition and for faffing to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B). See, e.g., State ex rel. Bealler v.
Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 36, 37, 740 N.E.2d 1100, 1102; State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 324, 750 N.E.2d 167. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.